Cell culture may seem straightforward once you’ve mastered the basics — preparing flasks, feeding cells, passaging at confluency — but true excellence lies in the fine details. Small deviations in key parameters can introduce major inconsistencies into your experiments, leading to unexpected variability, loss of cell phenotype, or even assay failure.

It’s not just about technique: the materials you use, such as your basal medium (like DMEM, RPMI, or MEM) and supplements like fetal bovine serum (FBS), play critical roles in influencing cell behaviour. Variations in media composition, serum batch quality, or culture conditions can significantly impact growth rates, viability, morphology, and experimental reproducibility. Even when using trusted brands, monitoring and optimising your culture environment remains essential.

Whether you’re working with primary cells, mesenchymal stem cells, or immortalised cell lines, understanding and tracking specific culture metrics ensures cell health, improves reproducibility, and strengthens your experimental outcomes.

In this article, we highlight seven critical numbers every researcher should monitor — and explain why they matter for achieving consistent, high-quality results.

The passage number reflects how many times a population of cells has been subcultured (split and reseeded into new vessels) since its original isolation or revival from cryostorage. Each passage marks a round of cell expansion and propagation.

Although passage number is often treated as a routine metric, it plays a critical role in determining cell quality, performance, and experimental reproducibility. Over time, cells accumulate molecular and epigenetic changes during in vitro culture. These changes can lead to significant shifts in behaviour, such as altered gene expression, slower proliferation, reduced viability, or unwanted differentiation — even when cell morphology remains unchanged.

Why Do We Need to Monitor and Record Cell Passage Number?

Monitoring and recording passage number ensures:

• Consistency across experiments: Using cells at different passage numbers can introduce variability into your data.
• Predictable behaviour: Cells behave more consistently within a defined passage window. Beyond that, they may show signs of senescence or genetic drift.
• Compliance and traceability: In GMP workflows or publication-quality research, full traceability of cell handling is expected — and that includes passage history.
• Decision-making: Knowing the passage number helps researchers decide when to create new working stocks, discard aging cultures, or troubleshoot changes in phenotype.

Failing to track passage number can result in irreproducible results, misleading conclusions, and wasted resources — especially in long-term studies or preclinical development pipelines.

What Constitutes a Passage?

In routine cell culture, each subculture or reseeding is considered one passage.

However, a common question arises:
Does thawing frozen cells count as a new passage?
The answer is no — passage number should increase upon reseeding, not upon freezing.

Example:
If you have a working cell line at passage 1 (P1), and you trypsinise and freeze these cells, you label the vial as P2. When thawed, they remain P2 until you subculture them again, at which point they become P3.

Why Passage Number Alone Isn’t Enough

Passage number does not account for split ratios or seeding densities, and therefore provides limited insight into how many times the cells have actually divided.

Consider this scenario:

• Researcher A splits a culture at P10 using a 1:4 ratio.
• Researcher B splits the same culture at P10 using a 1:10 ratio.
• Both label the next flask as P11.

However, the cells split 1:10 must proliferate more to reach confluence, meaning they undergo more population doublings (PDs). Over time, this can result in cells that are genetically and functionally different, even though their passage numbers are identical.

Why PD Tracking Matters

• More accurate: Reflects true replication history, especially when split ratios vary.
• Informs senescence thresholds: Particularly important for primary cells and MSCs, where function declines with excessive replication.
• Enhances comparability: Useful when comparing results across different donors, media formulations, or labs.
• Supports translational research: Essential for regulatory documentation and reproducibility in clinical-grade workflows.

Monitoring PD in tandem with passage number and doubling time provides a multi-dimensional view of culture health, enabling better decision-making, especially in long-term or translational studies.

2. Cell Seeding Density

Cell seeding density — the number of cells plated per unit area (for adherent cells) or per unit volume (for suspension cells) — is a fundamental parameter in cell culture. It directly influences growth rate, morphology, gene expression, and the outcome of downstream assays.

Incorrect seeding can lead to:

• Over-confluency, causing contact inhibition, altered signalling, or early senescence
• Low density, which can stress cells, delay growth, or alter behaviour
• Experimental variability, especially in assays dependent on cell–cell interactions, secreted factors, or differentiation cues

Maintaining an appropriate seeding density ensures:

• Uniform cell distribution and attachment (for adherent cells)
• Optimal nutrient and oxygen access
• Consistency across replicates and time points
• Maintenance of key cellular functions and phenotypes

Typical Ranges

These are only general ranges. Optimal densities vary based on the cell type, assay type, culture vessel size, and experimental goals.

Pro Tip: It’s recommended to seed more cells immediately after thawing than during routine passaging, as post-thaw cell viability is typically lower.

Factors That Influence Cell Seeding Density

Cell density requirements differ widely depending on:

• Cell type – Some cells (e.g., primary neurons or endothelial cells) need tight cell–cell contact to survive, while others (e.g., fibroblasts) tolerate low-density seeding.
• Application – Proliferation assays require low starting densities, whereas differentiation may require higher initial confluency.

Consult published literature and perform pilot experiments to determine the most appropriate seeding density for your specific system. What works for one lab or cell line may not apply to another.

How to Calculate Seeding Density

Here’s a quick guide to help you calculate the correct seeding density for your experiment:

1. Determine the desired seeding density — e.g., X cells/cm²
2. Count your cells using a hemocytometer or automated counter
3. Calculate total cells needed by multiplying X with the total surface area of your vessel
4. Centrifuge your cell suspension and resuspend the pellet in a smaller known volume (e.g., 1 mL) — call this volume Y
5. Calculate the volume needed to reach the desired seeding density using:

Example: You need 2 × 10⁵ cells/well in a 6-well plate. If you have 1 × 10⁶ cells/mL, you would need 0.2 mL per well.

3. Confluency Percentage

Cell confluency refers to the percentage of a culture surface covered by adherent cells. It is a quick and essential visual indicator of cell proliferation and overall culture health.

More than just a routine metric, confluency is used to guide decisions across the entire cell culture workflow—from passaging and cryopreservation to experimental treatments and differentiation. Importantly, cell behaviour, gene expression, and responsiveness to external stimuli are all highly influenced by confluency levels.

What Is Cell Confluency?

Confluency is not a direct count of cells, but rather a visual estimate of surface coverage. For example, a 70% confluent flask has 70% of its surface area occupied by adherent cells.

Used correctly, confluency helps determine:

• When to split or passage cells
• The best time for transfection or drug treatment
• Whether the culture is suitable for downstream applications like differentiation, reprogramming, or harvesting

The Risks of Over-Confluency

Failure to passage at the right time can lead to:

• Nutrient depletion and metabolic stress
• Cells entering growth arrest, senescence, or apoptosis
• Accumulation of toxic cellular debris from dying cells
• Altered morphology and gene expression that misrepresent in vivo conditions
• Higher risk of contamination, particularly fungal or bacterial

Why Accurate Estimation Is Critical

Despite its importance, confluency is still often estimated by eye under a microscope. This “guesstimation” is subjective and can vary between users—even for the same person on different days. Estimating between 60–90% confluency, the most critical range for many procedures, is especially error-prone.

Accurate and consistent estimation of confluency supports:

• Reproducibility: Ensures cells are in the same physiological state across experiments
• Efficiency: Avoids wasted reagents and failed workflows due to mistimed actions
• Experimental validity: Ensures transfection and drug treatments are performed under optimal growth conditions

Recommended Confluency Targets by Application

Pro Tips for Better Confluency Estimation

• Use reference images for training and standardisation
• Keep a photographic log of typical confluency stages
• Use quantification tools like ImageJ or confluency analysis software when possible
• Adopt automated imaging systems for objective monitoring

Strategies to Prevent Over-Confluency

Over-confluency is a preventable issue that can derail entire experiments. Use these proactive strategies:

1. Regular Monitoring: Check your cultures daily under a microscope and record observations. Unexpected growth spurts can happen quickly.
2. Optimise Seeding Density: Starting with too many cells can lead to rapid overgrowth. Tailor seeding density to your cell type, vessel size, and application.
3. Use Larger Culture Vessels: If frequent passaging becomes burdensome, scaling up to larger flasks or plates may reduce handling frequency.
4. Adjust Media Change Frequency: Fast-growing cells may deplete nutrients quickly. More frequent media changes can help sustain viability and delay confluence.
5. Optimise Culture Conditions: Ensure proper CO₂ levels, humidity, and temperature. Cells under stress may behave unpredictably, affecting growth dynamics.
6. Establish SOPs and Thresholds: Define clear confluency thresholds in your protocols—for example, “Passage cells when 80% confluent”—to improve consistency across the lab.

4. Viability Percentage

Cell viability is a key indicator of overall cell health and is critical for ensuring reliable and reproducible experimental outcomes. Whether you’re conducting transfections, drug assays, differentiation studies, or preparing cells for cryopreservation, maintaining a high viability percentage helps ensure consistent and physiologically relevant results.

Low viability can:

• Distort assay outcomes due to interference from dead or dying cells
• Trigger stress responses that alter gene and protein expression
• Lower transfection or infection efficiency
• Cause batch-to-batch inconsistencies that undermine reproducibility

Target Threshold

• A healthy cell culture is characterised by 80-95%, and is generally recommended for most standard experiments.
• FDA Guidance: For ex vivo gene-modified cells (e.g., CAR-T, MSCs), the FDA recommends a minimum viability of 70%. If lower, supporting data must show it doesn’t affect safety, efficacy, or delivery, as dead cells or debris may compromise the therapeutic outcome.

How to Assess Viability

• Trypan Blue Exclusion: Simple, manual counting method using a hemocytometer or automated counter.
• Flow Cytometry with viability dyes (e.g., PI, 7-AAD): Allows multiparametric analysis.
• Fluorescent or colourimetric assays (e.g., MTT, Resazurin): Suitable for high-throughput screening.

The Role of FBS in Cell Viability

FBS is one of the most critical components in many culture media formulations. It provides essential growth factors, hormones, adhesion molecules, and nutrients that support cell attachment, proliferation, and survival.

Using trusted, high-quality FBS is crucial for maintaining viability because:

• Poor-quality or variable FBS can lead to unpredictable cell behaviour and low viability.
• Contaminated or improperly heat-inactivated FBS may cause cytotoxic effects.
• Batch-to-batch variability in FBS can create inconsistencies in experimental results unless the FBS is rigorously tested and validated.

Common Causes of Low Viability

• Suboptimal thawing or freeze–thaw cycles
• Over-confluent cultures leading to nutrient depletion
• Harsh enzymatic detachment
• Contamination (e.g., mycoplasma, endotoxins)
• Poor media quality or inappropriate supplements like unstable or inconsistent FBS

Tips to Improve Cell Viability

• Use pre-warmed, complete media with high-quality FBS
• Avoid over-handling or exposing cells to room temperature for prolonged periods
• Optimise enzymatic detachment conditions
• Maintain proper seeding density after thawing to encourage recovery
• Perform routine QC (e.g., mycoplasma testing, media pH, osmolality checks)

High viability isn’t just about surviving—it’s about ensuring your cells are healthy, active, and behaving as expected. Trustworthy reagents like certified FBS form the backbone of a reliable culture system.

5. Mycoplasma Testing Frequency

Mycoplasma contamination is one of the most insidious and underdiagnosed problems in cell culture. Unlike bacterial or fungal contamination, mycoplasma does not cause turbidity in the media and often goes unnoticed—while silently wreaking havoc on experimental integrity.

These tiny, cell wall–less bacteria can:

• Alter cell metabolism, proliferation, and gene expression
• Interfere with transfection efficiency and cytokine responses
• Compromise reproducibility and lead to false experimental conclusions
• Go undetected for weeks or months, especially in shared incubators or labs

Recommended Testing Frequency

High-Risk Scenarios Needing Frequent Monitoring

• Shared or core lab environments
• Long-term culture experiments
• Laboratories working with primary or stem cellsS
• Labs using pooled or co-cultures
• Facilities preparing cells for clinical or preclinical use

Testing Methods

• PCR-based kits: Fast, sensitive, and widely used
• DNA staining (e.g., Hoechst 33258): Useful for microscopy-based detection
• Enzymatic assays: Quick and simple for routine screening
• Culture-based assays: Gold standard but time-consuming and not suitable for rapid decisions

Best Practices

• Quarantine new cell lines until cleared
• Maintain detailed records of all test results
• Implement standard operating procedures for contamination response
• Avoid using antibiotics long-term to mask contamination

Proactive, scheduled mycoplasma testing and frequent mycoplasma decontamination practice is a small investment of time that can save months of compromised work.

6. pH Range of Culture Medium

The pH of culture media plays a crucial role in influencing cell viability, metabolism, enzyme activity, and overall experimental reproducibility. Any deviation from the optimal pH range can lead to altered cellular behaviour, unreliable data, or even complete culture failure. Maintaining stable pH is especially critical for sensitive cell types, such as primary cells and stem cells.

The optimal pH range for mammalian cells is typically between 7.2 – 7.4. A pH below 7.2 is considered acidic, while a pH above 7.4 is regarded as alkaline.

What Do pH Changes in Cell Culture Media Indicate?

Acidic Conditions – Usually indicate overgrown cultures or possible microbial contamination. As cells metabolise nutrients, they release acidic byproducts such as lactic acid, which lowers the pH. This is particularly common in dense cultures or when media changes are infrequent.

Alkaline Conditions – May arise from insufficient CO₂ levels in the incubator or prolonged exposure of the culture dish to air. It can also occur when cells are not metabolically active, such as after cell death or in the early stages post-thaw.

pH Regulation Mechanisms

1. Phenol Red Indicator

Phenol red, a common pH indicator in cell culture media, shifts from pink (neutral) to orange or yellow (acidic), providing a visual cue to monitor media condition in real-time. A yellowing of the medium signals increased acidity and typically indicates the need for a media change, regardless of the scheduled feeding timeline.

Does Phenol Red Affect Cells?

In most cases, phenol red is harmless and useful for maintaining healthy cultures. However, certain sensitive cell lines or experimental setups may require phenol red-free media. This is because phenol red exhibits weak estrogen-like activity that can influence hormone-responsive cells or interfere with assays sensitive to estrogenic compounds. It may also cause background signals in techniques like flow cytometry or fluorescence-based assays. For these situations, phenol red-free formulations are preferred.

2. Sodium Bicarbonate–CO₂ Buffering System

Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO₃) is a natural, non-toxic buffer commonly used in cell culture media. It requires a 5% CO₂ incubator for buffering, as CO₂ dissolves in the medium, forming carbonic acid, which interacts with bicarbonate ions to stabilise pH.

The amount of NaHCO₃ in the medium dictates the amount of CO₂ that should be used to maintain the pH. Physiological pH is generally considered to be in the range of 7.2 to 7.4 for normal tissues, but some disease states (such as cancer) may require culture at a lower pH. Eagle’s Minimal Essential Medium (EMEM) supplemented with Earle’s Balanced Salt Solution (EBSS) and most other cell culture media typically contains 26mM sodium bicarbonate, whereas DMEM has a higher concentration of 44mM.

3. HEPES Buffer – For pH Stability Outside CO₂ Incubators

HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazine ethanesulfonic acid) is a zwitterionic organic buffer widely used in cell culture to maintain stable pH, especially in environments where CO₂ levels may fluctuate. HEPES is particularly effective within a pH range of 6.8 to 8.2, making it suitable for a variety of mammalian cell lines.

Why Use HEPES?

• Strong Buffering Capacity: HEPES offers more stable pH control than sodium bicarbonate, especially in environments where CO₂ concentrations are unstable.
• CO₂-Independent Buffering: Unlike bicarbonate, HEPES doesn’t require CO₂ to function, making it ideal for experiments conducted outside standard incubators (e.g., live imaging, flow cytometry, and molecular biology assays).
• Minimal pH Drift: HEPES helps prevent rapid pH shifts when cells are exposed to ambient air, improving consistency during handling outside the incubator.

Biowest Basal Media – Flexible Formulations for Every Cell Culture Need

Biowest offers a broad range of basal media formulations tailored to the diverse needs of researchers working with various cell types and experimental conditions. Whether culturing robust immortalised lines, sensitive primary cells, or stem cells, Biowest provides ready-to-use media with or without HEPES and sodium bicarbonate to support optimal pH control and buffering.

Standard Options Include:

• With Sodium Bicarbonate: Ideal for use in 5% CO₂ incubators, supporting classic bicarbonate buffering systems.
• With HEPES Buffer: For experiments requiring stable pH outside CO₂ incubators, such as live imaging, flow cytometry, or field sampling.
• Without HEPES/Bicarbonate: Offers flexibility to customize buffering systems based on specific experimental needs.

7. Endotoxin Levels

Endotoxins, also known as lipopolysaccharides (LPS), are components of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. These molecules can be released in small amounts during bacterial growth, and in larger quantities upon bacterial lysis. Even trace levels of endotoxins can compromise the health of cultured cells, particularly in sensitive applications such as stem cell expansion, immunotherapy development, bioproduction, or modeling inflammatory diseases. Their effects are often subtle but can lead to erratic, irreproducible, or misleading experimental results.

How Endotoxins Affect Cell Culture Outcomes

Even at low concentrations, endotoxins can:

• Stimulate cytokine and chemokine secretion (especially in immune-related cells)
• Activate inflammatory signalling and oxidative stress pathways
• Disrupt normal cell proliferation, differentiation, and morphology
• Impair protein expression in recombinant systems
• Reduce cell viability or induce apoptosis—particularly in primary or stem cell cultures

Cell types especially vulnerable to endotoxins include:

• Immune cells: macrophages, dendritic cells, PBMCs
• Stem cells: MSCs, ESCs, iPSCs
• Cells used in transfection, viral vector production, or therapeutic protein manufacturing

Common Sources of Endotoxin Contamination

Endotoxins can enter your culture system through various routes:

• Water used for buffer or reagent preparation
• Commercially sourced media, sera, and supplements
• Contaminated labware (glass or plastic)
• Improperly sterilised or reused culture vessels
• Exposure to air or poor aseptic techniques

Biowest Quality Assurance

Biowest provides FBS and basal media that are LAL-tested and supplied with lot-specific certificates of analysis for endotoxin levels, ensuring consistency and reliability across experiments. Their stringent quality control processes support reproducible, high-performance outcomes—even in the most sensitive applications.

Biowest’s Ultra-low-Endotoxin FBS is specifically designed to meet the rigorous demands of sensitive cell culture systems. Each lot is carefully formulated and thoroughly tested to comply with strict endotoxin thresholds, making it an ideal choice for culturing primary cells, stem cells, and cells destined for clinical or biopharmaceutical applications. With Biowest, you can be confident your cells are growing in an environment that supports both viability and integrity.

Conclusion

Cell culture is as much a science of numbers as it is of technique. Mastering key quantitative parameters—like passage number, seeding density, and confluency—can mean the difference between reproducible results and experimental failure. Equally important are less visible but critical metrics such as viability, mycoplasma testing frequency, culture medium pH, and endotoxin levels. Together, these seven numbers form the foundation of a robust, reliable cell culture system. By staying vigilant and informed about these values, researchers can improve consistency, protect cell health, and ensure meaningful outcomes—whether working with standard cell lines or advancing sensitive clinical applications.

Special Offer: Atlantis Bioscience x Biowest – Buy 10, Get 1 FREE!

Don’t miss this exclusive promotion from Atlantis Bioscience and Biowest! For a limited time, when you purchase any 10 bottles of Biowest’s premium cell culture media or reagents, you’ll receive the 11th bottle free—automatically applied to the lowest-value item in your order. This is the perfect opportunity to stock up on high-quality essentials for your research while saving more.

to claim your free bottle now.

Reference

Bio, C. (2024, June 19). Understanding pH and osmolality in cell culture media. Captivate Bio. https://captivatebio.com/understanding-ph-osmolality-cell-culture-media/

Cell Culture: Techniques, types, and growth monitoring | Danaher Life Sciences. (n.d.). Danaher Life Sciences. https://lifesciences.danaher.com/us/en/library/cell-culture.html#:~:text=The%20optimal%20CO2%20level%20for,can%20be%20toxic%20to%20cells.

Cell viability assays | Abcam. (n.d.). https://www.abcam.com/en-us/technical-resources/guides/cell-health-guide/cell-viability-assays#:~:text=Briefly%2C%20cell%20viability%20is%20the,get%20washed%20away%20during%20trypsinizing.

CO2 concentration and pH control in the cell culture laboratory. (n.d.). Culture Collections. https://www.culturecollections.org.uk/culture-collection-news/co2-concentration-and-ph-control-in-the-cell-culture-laboratory/

Maintaining cells | ATCC. (n.d.). https://www.atcc.org/the-science/culturing-cells/maintaining-cells

Office, S. (2025, February 25). CMC requirements for cell and gene therapy for IND applications | BioAgilytix. BioAgilytix. https://www.bioagilytix.com/blog/cmc-requirements-for-cell-and-gene-therapy-for-ind-applications/

Percentage of Viable Cells. (n.d.). ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/percentage-of-viable-cells